YouTube - The State of AGW Climate Change Theory 3-1-2010

Absolutely hilarious. What America really thinks about the man-made global warming debate. Must see Martin Short character Nathan Therm at 6:20.

Roger Pielke Jr.'s Blog: Engage Your Opponents or Just Call them "Nutters"?

Calling people with whom you disagree "nutters" is a good example of the excessive arrogance in the scientific community, a problem that does not look to be going away anytime soon. The notion that "good science" will wreak revenge on the "nutters" who "control the agenda" suggests that we can expect even more politicized science, that is to say, political battles waged through science.

Transcript: Oral Evidence Taken before the Science and Technology Committee (Science and Technology Sub- Committee) on Monday 1 March 2010

Lord Lawson of Blaby: He has gone, but there is still Sir Geoffrey Bolton, who is an extremely eminent geologist; but he is a committed climate alarmist, and Sir Muir Russell said that we did not want anybody who had a firm view on the issue. He is a committed climate alarmist. He is perfectly entitled to his view, but he has written and spoken on that. He is also, of course, a very distinguished alumnus of the University of East Anglia and the environmental section of that where the CRU comes from. The first 18 years of his career, his formative years, were there. All I would say is I think that it shows us, at the very least, a certain carelessness to have packed the committee in this way, and it does not create confidence.

Will America Stand for $7 a Gallon?

[Rush Limbaugh] If we're going to save the climate, if we're going to reduce the greenhouse gases and if we're going to perpetuate this hoax, you people have to feel the pain, you people are going to have to suffer seven-dollar-a-gallon gasoline recommended by some researchers at Harvard. Those are the people Obama loves. Those are the people Obama listens to.