How to Fabricate Climate Change Evidence « The Libertarian Alliance: BLOG

Even as a very new, trainee corn merchant I knew better than to draw a sample from only the best part of the bulk. It would lead to the actual delivery being rejected and to great extra expense to my boss. He never liked that sort of thing. There seems to be no similar sanction for scientists drawing bad samples of climate and temperature with equipment known to be faulty. If the results are what the politicians want to hear, they are fine. The enormous bill for remediating “climate change” will simply be passed to the taxpayer – even if it isn’t actually happening.

American Thinker Blog: The case against AGW: Pluto's atmosphere

Now, why would the Plutonian atmosphere double? Solar driven global warming.

No Frakking Consensus: IPCC Reliance on Grey Literature 30 Times Greater than UK Threshold

As the citizen audit results I released four days ago reveal, the 18,531 references cited by the IPCC are so far from being 99 percent peer-reviewed it's laughable. A full 30 percent of them (5,587) were not published in peer-reviewed academic journals.

[And it would have been one thousand times, except CO2 killed off the other ninety percent?]

Researchers scouring the world's oceans have been forced to drastically revise estimates for the number of microbial species residing there after a census indicated up to one hundred times the expected diversity may be present.