Monday, April 12, 2010

"Is Science Just Another Religion? Part 1" by Science Becoming Religion / LJWorld.com
If the claim by the priests of global warming that what they are doing is accepted practice by modern science, then science has become nothing more than a form of religion. It is based on acceptance of beliefs by faith rather than rigorous examination of physical reality through experimentation and observation.

Real science used to be based on verification through experimentation and observation. Global Warming "science" is based on acceptance of long disproved 19th Century beliefs.
...
Real science is mathematically rigorous. Global Warming "science" is mathematically ridiculous. The only evidence for what they call global warming is something called an average global temperature.
Work for Greenpeace to STOP GLOBAL WARMING - $12-$13/hr* | Civic Direct
Greenpeace is hiring individuals to join our Frontline fundraising team. The pay is $12-$13 per hour plus bonus and benefits. The best employees looking for careers are trained to manage Greenpeace offices or local campaign work.
Mark Landsbaum: EPA choking freedom - Opinion - The Orange County Register
The EPA's unprecedented claim to sovereignty over things that move and many that remain stationary is being challenged in court by no fewer than 15 states' attorneys general, and private plaintiffs, including 500 scientists, who dispute the IPCC's science. The nut of the challenges is that the government exceeded its authority in declaring CO2 a harmful pollutant, and that underlying science is fatally flawed.
Eco Factory - Climate Talks Grind to a Halt in Bonn
Insiders say that the European Union is battling with internal turmoil as some nations suffering economically under the EU carbon trading scheme wish to exit the program, while other countries say the program will pay dividends once a global carbon cap is in place.
...
The position of United States thus far is that per capita is an inappropriate measurement when trying to combat global warming. Gross emissions, for which China is the worst, is more appropriate said United States negotiator Todd Stern. He also said that China could "forget" about ever receiving climate aid from the United States.

No comments: