Friday, April 02, 2010

Obama to Crush Economy with Massive CO2 Taxes as Early as Next Week
Abandoning all loyalty to the democratic processes this nation holds dear, President Obama has made the decision that getting energy tax legislation through Congress with the approval of the American people is just too much of a pain to bother with. Instead he will have the EPA declare as early as next week that CO2 is a dangerous global warming gas and will start regulating its emissions immediately.

Obama’s promise to open up vast stretches of ocean on the East Coast and Gulf of Mexico to energy exploration is simply a ruse to soften up the public for soon to be announced draconian regulations.
Global Warming Ruling: A Monument to Bad Science and Judicial Activism
Conclusion. In conclusion, what do we get—we get a Supreme Court ruling that is scientifically flawed, which was arrived at by ignoring logic and legal precedent, in order to reach a result that would please the global warming fanatics.

99% of Americans will never know about the legal errors that led to this ruling. Eventually the scientific community will come to acknowledge that the Massachusetts v. EPA case was politically based and scientifically flawed. But for now, the case represents a theory that is falsely held to be a fact, which has risen to the top by popular demand, regardless of true science.
Global Warming, Underestimated | The Cornell Daily Sun
Using the melting of the Arctic as an example, [Prof. Charles H. Greene, earth and atmospheric sciences] demonstrates the IPCC’s inaccurate predictions.

“The IPCC model of Arctic Sea melting shows concerns that the Arctic would lose all ice cover by the end of the century,” Greene said. According to his research, “We are losing ice much more quickly. It could be gone by 2025 to 2030.”
2007: [Asymmetrical Revkin - When sea ice fluctuated downward,  he considered it a BIG DEAL] - NYTimes.com
Astonished by the summer’s changes, scientists are studying the forces that exposed one million square miles of open water — six Californias — beyond the average since satellites started measurements in 1979.

At a recent gathering of sea-ice experts at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks, Hajo Eicken, a geophysicist, summarized it this way: “Our stock in trade seems to be going away.”
2010: [When sea ice fluctuated back upward, Revkin covers it with a "ho-hum" Tweet]
Arctic sea ice ups, downs will inevitably be embraced by someone. Now ice extent is up near satellite-era average: http://j.mp/SeaIceUp #agw

No comments: