Climate Rescue Weblog: Will the real ClimateGate please stand up? (part 2)
Emerging battle-bruised from the disaster zone of Copenhagen, but ever-hopeful, a rider on horseback brought news of darkness and light: "The politicians have failed. Now it's up to us. We must break the law to make the laws we need: laws that are supposed to protect society, and protect our future. Until our laws do that, screw being climate lobbyists. Screw being climate activists. It's not working. We need an army of climate outlaws."
The proper channels have failed. It's time for mass civil disobedience to cut off the financial oxygen from denial and skepticism.
If you're one of those who believe that this is not just necessary but also possible, speak to us. Let's talk about what that mass civil disobedience is going to look like.
If you're one of those who have spent their lives undermining progressive climate legislation, bankrolling junk science, fueling spurious debates around false solutions, and cattle-prodding democratically-elected governments into submission, then hear this:
We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.
And we be many, but you be few.
Posts
10 comments:
Green"peace" appears to be counselling some very dangerous activities here and creating legal issues for themselves.
Sounds like Greenpeace needs the services of Ben Santer.
And we're going to put bright yellow banners on your buildings.
And possibly be very cross with you over tea.
Because that's how we roll.
So Greenpiss now agree that the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior was a good thing, seeing as how it was being used for, quote, "bankrolling junk science, fuelling spurious debates around false solutions, and cattle-prodding democratically-elected governments into submission," end quote.
When you have no science to work with, you need to produce hysterical nonsense like this.
Where is your outrage at climate scientists receiving real death threats from anonymous cowards? Yeah, you keep quiet about that. Hypocrite.
It is so much fun to play the name game. Just replace "Green Peace" with "Tea Party" and read this article again. Janet Napolitano and her thugs would be kicking in doors right now. In their eyes the Tea Party "incites violence", but Green Peace is simply saving the planet. Let's hope we are the people who write the history!
I have never had the least doubt that "GreenPeace" are just ordinary fascists. Pol-Pot was the first of them. Which is going to be their next monster?
Greenpeace has now shown its' true color "terrorist red"-It is now the responsibility of every law bidding citizen to report any known members of "Greenpeace" to Home land Security" It is our responsibility to protect our self, our loved ones and the innocent people that can be hurt or killed in one of their attacks.
It is also now possible to go after anyone that has contributed to this terrorist organization for supporting terrorism. If there are any government funds going to Greenpeace- the terrorist organization they must be stopped. Individuals as George Soros, Al Gore, Barrack Obama, Bill Clinton and others should be charged with supporting "terrorism"
All of the environmental papers of "Greenpeace" used by the IPCC or the EPA must be thrown out because they are not the work of scientific people by are the work of "TERRORISTS"
this was not some randon green activist:
it was a climategate article on the official green website..
Written by a communications director of green peace:
Green peace responded to me, when I complained.
http://weblog.greenpeace.org/climate/2010/04/will_the_real_climategate_plea_1.html
Greenpeace response:
"What about Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks, Nelson Mandela? They were definitively outlaws"
Shame on you:
Greenpeace
Can anyone imagine any of these outstanding people saying:
'we know where you live'
I consider that, as many other people would, an out an out threat personally, to me and my family..
Why say it?
Are they going to come and knockon my door and have a friendly chat over a cup of tea...
That was a threat...
The law says people can 'perceive a threat'
I am shocked to see that this was from a communications director for Greenpeace, I had thought that it was just some words of some randon activists...
Can you not see that this could incite 'some' people (ie they 'misinterprete Gene - to be generous - to be 'climate outlaws' - does that include violence/sounds at least like violent acts) to acts of personal intimidation and violence...
Please publically apologise, and make a statement, to prevent any lunatic bringing Greenpeace into further disrepute. I am worried for my personal safety and my families, as I do not agree with catastrophic unprecedented man made global warming, it is an example of a popular delusion and the madness of crowds.
What about Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks, Nelson Mandela?
Yeah, what about them?
Post a Comment