Harry Reid’s “Smaller” Energy Bill Would Come with Big Costs | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.
...The annual losses in economic activity (gross domestic product) reach $197 billion by 2020, $300 billion by 2030, and more than $325 billion by 2035. Summing up the impacts for 2012 to 2035 yields a total GDP loss of $5.2 trillion. That’s quite a hefty price tag for a “smaller” energy bill.Climate Common Sense: A World Gone Mad! Windmills instead of Drugs!
As the sufferers are black and remote from the Chardonnay set and the liberal intelligentsia they can become part of the grand Global Warming Experiment and can become recipients of Global Warming education and training , without ever being treated as actual humans . As long as they are educated in the perils of Global Warming who cares what diseases they have or whether they are starving because of bio-fuel inflated food prices.The image of the noble savage with his spear in tune with nature and Gaia , envisaged by these eco-nuts is far from the squalor,hunger and disease of reality.Kerry-(Graham)-Lieberman Bill a Huge Payoff to Big Business | The SPPI Blog
Washington, D.C., May 11, 2010—As Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) prepare to introduce their long-delayed energy-rationing legislation, the Competitive Enterprise Institute calls on Americans to remember what is really at stake: government control over energy use and massive kickbacks to favored corporations.Climate Change Timeline – 1895-2009 « I Hate Al Gore
For at least 114 years, climate “scientists” have been claiming that the climate was going to kill us…but they have kept switching whether it was a coming ice age, or global warming.Great Debate Part III – Glikson accidentally vindicates the skeptics! « JoNova
Decades ago, the catastrophe-crowd made guesses about the feedbacks—but they were wrong. Instead of amplifying carbon’s effect two-fold (or more!) the feedbacks dampen it.
No comments:
Post a Comment