Scientists Challenge: 'A Greenhouse Effect on the Moon?' | Climate Depot
'Belief that radiating trace gases explain why earth's surface temperature deviates from a simple mathematical formula is based on deeply erroneous assumptions about theoretical vs. real bodies'Is Global Warming Really Cause for Alarm? by Paul Driessen, Willie Soon and David R. Legates | Climate Realists
If we didn’t know better, we’d think the operative rules were: Never seek logical or alternative answers, if you can blame a phenomenon or problem (like decreasing frog populations) on global warming. Do whatever it takes and fund whatever research is needed, to advance the goals of ending hydrocarbon use, increasing government control and “transforming” society. And always include the terms “global warming” or “climate change” in any grant application.Science 135, global warming 110 « Don Surber
It may not be corruption. But it sure skews the research, conclusions and policy recommendations.
It is a well-off society that can debate how many angels are on the head of a pin — or how many exhalations a man can have before he raises the Earth’s temperature beyond repair. Al Gore is right. The debate is over. His side lost — as doomsayers always do.Don’t let frustration paralyse climate talks: UN environment chief (Interview)
“We should recognise how close (to a global treaty) we came in Copenhagen - recognise the number of miles walked, not just the last mile that was not,” Steiner, also a UN Undersecretary General, told IANS.No Frakking Consensus: We Trusted Too Completely
The fact that not one government - and not one science body - on this planet has conducted an independent audit of even a small portion of this report is breathtaking.
No comments:
Post a Comment