This is a typical story showing the character of the "consensus".
Whenever there are questions that really matter, the IPCC minimizes the number of people who have something to say about the subject - because many people could make the situation "complex". The purpose of this strategy is clear: the small number of authors (in this case, a single author) are expected to say that nothing aside from CO2 really matters - so that the important question isn't even discussed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
1 comment:
Interesting facts about CO2 science.
Post a Comment