Anatomy of a Botched Ambush: ABC Fails to Score Global Warming Point on Inhofe
Network's senior congressional correspondent tries to conflate weather with climate, which alarmists cried foul over during this year's winter weather.The 7 Things That Killed the Climate Bill : TreeHugger
The news that reverberated around the web yesterday was hardly unexpected -- the climate bill, which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid finally announced was officially dead, was on its way out for a long time. But that doesn't make its final departure any less devastating. In light of its passage let's look at what it is, exactly, that killed it. Here the 7 primary factors that contributed to its demise, plain and simple.Forget global-warming denial; Al's trying global-groping denial | NJ.com
And that brings up a crucial question about his judgment: How is this guy going to solve global warming when he can't even tell a legit masseuse from one who likes to give customers a happy ending? The dumbest guy I know could figure out how to hire the right woman for the job. Why can't the former vice-president?FOXNews.com - Senate Energy Debate is Still all About Cap-and-Trade
That's the real story here. And it is a hilarious one.
The best, surest way to derail the lame duck strategy is to prevent the Senate from passing any energy bill before the election that could get them into conference.[Investment strategist Jeremy Grantham still believes in the greatest scientific fraud in history]: Everything You Need to Know About Global Warming in 5 Minutes | The Big Picture
That’s why the energy debate in the Senate next week is so high stakes. It’s really all about cap-and-trade, and senators who vote yes will have to explain to angry constituents why they voted to advance cap-and-trade and cause energy prices to skyrocket.
Do we believe the whole elite of science is in a conspiracy? At some point in the development of a scientific truth, contrarians risk becoming flat earthers.Money makes the activists go round - On Line Opinion - 28/6/2010
10) Conspiracy theorists claim to believe that global warming is a carefully constructed hoax driven by scientists desperate for … what? Being needled by nonscientific newspaper reports, by blogs, and by right-wing politicians and think tanks? Most hard scientists hate themselves or their colleagues for being in the news. Being a climate scientist spokesman has already become a hindrance to an academic career, including tenure. I have a much simpler but plausible “conspiracy theory”: that fossil energy companies, driven by the need to protect hundreds of billions of dollars of profits, encourage obfuscation of the inconvenient scientific results.
Despite clear evidence that the funds are going to the global warming side and the amounts going to sceptic organisations of various sorts being derisory by comparison, activists continue to scream about how the debate is loaded against them. The reality is that sceptics remain mostly unpaid part timers but those dedicated volunteers have managed to score impressive victories against full-time climate scientists backed by massive resources. Having the truth on your side does help, sometimes.Data Stonewalling Resumes « Climate Audit
...Ammann demonstrated the new Team openness by simply not acknowledging or replying to Ryan’s request.
No comments:
Post a Comment