Global warming: An inquiry that doesn't look at the science cannot understand Climategate

As with other inquiries into the affair, the Russell review states that they did not examine the science and that the science is correct.

Lord Russell of Holyrood « Climate Audit

They adopted a unique inquiry process in which they interviewed only one side – CRU. As a result, the report is heavily weighted towards CRU apologia – a not unexpected result given that the writing team came from Geoffrey Boulton’s Royal Society of Edinburgh.

Climategate report: 'Campaign to win hearts and minds' needed • The Register

What Climategate is largely about, then, is whether the academics were justified in making that Medieval Warm Period disappear.

Unfortunately, none of the three 'independent' reviews have grappled with this.

[I doubt it]: Germany will only use renewable energy for electricity production in 2050

The chairman of the Federal Environmental Agency of Germany has said it clearly: "A full conversion to renewable energy by 2050 is possible from a technical and ecological." "It's a very realistic goal based on technology that already exist..."