Kagan: Citizens Should Sue Companies For Causing Global Warming - Minnesotans For Global Warming
Environmental issues dominated the last portion of the questioning, with Feinstein asking about the reach of the Environmental Protection Agency and the ability of citizens to sue companies for contributing to pollution and global warming. Normally, citizens can only bring cases if they have been personally "injured," but environmental injury is a gray area.Nature Magazine Covers Video Controversy - Minnesotans For Global Warming
"Do you believe it's possible for citizens to demonstrate that environmental harms have injured them for constitutional purposes?" Feinstein asked.
"The answer is yes, much depending on what Congress does," Kagan replied.
We weren't quoted but they did include an image form our second video "Hide the Decline II". The thing that I found interesting from this article is now "Global Warming" Scientists seem to be more interested in the polls about what people believe than what the temperature is doing.The All-American Light Bulb Dims as Freedom Flickers - Deroy Murdock - National Review Online
Instead of graphs tracking global temperature these charts are tracking if people "believe" in Global Warming or not and what kind of support there is for carbon taxes.
The article says nothing about what the scientist were caught saying in their emails and if they were fraudulent or not, but rather about how to do damage control. They want to "humanize climate scientists" to regain the public's trust. Here's an idea stop lying to us
In one of his most shameful moments, former president George W. Bush foolishly signed the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. EISA establishes performance criteria that Edisonian bulbs cannot meet. As the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) explains: “These standards, which begin in 2012, will eliminate low efficiency incandescent light bulbs from the market.”The trouble with Al | Jeff Fecke, Blog Of The Moderate Left
having read the complaint, I have to say that my gut tells me that it's more likely Gore is guilty of sexual assault than not guilty. He may not be convicted. Indeed, he likely won't be charged. But my gut tells me that Al Gore did something illegal and immoral in a Portland hotel room in 2006, and that is something that should not be taken lightly, and should not be minimized.Sorting Out Climate ‘Camps’ - Dot Earth Blog - NYTimes.com
Humans are rarely all evil or all good. Al Gore's actions in Portland in 2006 don't eliminate the good he's done on global warming. But the good he's done on global warming doesn't eliminate his actions in Portland in 2006. I will never look at Al Gore the same way again. And if his actions lead to civil or criminal penalties against him, he has nobody to blame but himself.
While I now write for the opinion section of The New York Times, I readily admit I was never neutral in covering global warming. In fact, I’ve always been a passionate advocate — for reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment