Melanie Phillips on Prince Charles: Frankly, more sense is spoken by his plants

Perhaps the most mind-twisting example of psychological projection is the claim that the people you victimise are actually victimising you – even while it is you who dominate and receive an uncritical reception on media talk shows, who get grant-funding to subsidise your professional career and whose books are prominently displayed in bookshops, while your opponents are kept off or are given a hard time on the talk-shows, receive precious little grant funding and can hardly get their books published. But as soon as those opponents finally make their voices heard to point out that you are in error, you start screaming that you are being victimised.

The fact is that the proponents of AGW have been rumbled as having perpetrated one of the biggest pseudo-scientific frauds of all time – and they know it. Hence the Royal scream. It's over, Your Royal Highness -- and you were on the wrong side.

The formerly popular Al Gore - The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan

Forty-four percent isn't the worst approval rating for a pol in the year 2010, but if you're an environmentalist, and you've spent two decades waiting for comprehensive energy legislation to pass, how much does it hurt to have your most powerful advocate knocked on the mat (by his own punch) with a few short months left to pass that legislation?

An Alaska pilot speaks out against the EPA avgas ban

...the EPA wants to outlaw the fuel that 95 percent of all Alaskan commercial planes HAVE TO USE. In Alaska 82 percent of our settlements cannot be reached by the use of the national road system, according to the Alaska Department of Transportation, so airplanes matter more to us than to folks in any other state of the union by an order of magnitude.

Audio: The Guardian's 'climategate' debate in full | Environment | guardian.co.uk

The entire recording [MP3] of the Guardian's 'climategate' debate, presented by George Monbiot

Global Warming Theory: False in Parts, False in Totality

There are so many variables ignored, underreported or simply not understood in climate science and especially in the computer models that purport to simulate global climate, that they destroy any pretence we know or understand weather and climate. But don’t take my word for it. Consider the comments from proponents of anthropogenic global warming including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).