NIA merged into God Believers Association (GBA) to fight Global Warming

Dr. Raj Baldev, Cosmo Theorist & Social Reformer: “It is how I on behalf of my organization contributed my service to the big cause. There was another reason for NIA’s name to change, since in India, they created an Investigation Agency by this name : National Investigation Agency (NIA), founded in 2009 as a new federal agency approved by the Indian Govt. to combat terror in India, and to avoid and mingle the name of peace body of NIA with the Investigation Agency, I decided to drop the NIA and merged it into God Believers Association (GBA), which covers NIA’s main mission of World Peace apart from other aims including fighting global warming to save the Earth planet.”

William M. Briggs, Statistician » Consensus Members Agree To Agree: Breaking Story

Now, what would you think of a study which examined members of the consensus, and which asked those members, “Do you agree with the consensus?”, and then reported that members of the consensus agree with the consensus as news?

Senate Energy Bills Spell Disaster for What Yet Remains of 'Wild Nature'

We humans, as stewards of the earth, have got to get our priorities straight. We have got to do all that we can to preserve nature by helping to feed humanity; and to do so successfully, we must let the air's CO2 content rise. Any policies that stand in the way of that objective -- such as those included in the proposed Senate Energy Bills -- are truly obscene.

Sherwood, Keith and Craig Idso

European Heat Waves of the Future May Not Be as Bad as Previously Predicted

Although Jeong et al.'s findings by no means constitute the final word on the subject of the ultimate climatic consequences of a doubling of the air's CO2 content, they indicate just how easily the incorporation of a new suite of knowledge, in even the best climate models of the day, can dramatically alter what the IPCC and other climate-alarmist organizations and individuals purport to be reality. The world of nature is so extremely complex that it is the height of arrogance -- or depth of ignorance -- to believe that the world's climate modelers are anywhere near being able to mathematically represent all that needs to be mathematically represented in a model of sufficient complexity to faithfully reproduce what actually happens in the real world of nature, and over the many orders of magnitude that they are reluctant to acknowledge are absolutely essential to obtain the answers we all seek, which are, of course, the correct answers, which are obviously still a long ways off.