Conflict-of-Interest at the IPCC « NoFrakkingConsensus

The report from the committee investigating the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just been released. Get your own copy here.

The report is 113 pages long, and will take time to digest. A quick look reveals that it acknowledges and address one of the biggest concerns expressed by critics of the IPCC – that this two-decades-old process has never had any conflict-of-interest guidelines.

Africa could teach the wheelie-bin lady a thing or two - Telegraph

Now look here, all you warmists and you warming-deniers, I don't care which of you is right about Kilimanjaro. I don't care whether Al Gore is correct in saying that the icy crown is being lost to global warming. And I don't care whether Christopher Booker is right to point out that the more likely culprit is deforestation of the surrounding area, which has reduced precipitation at the summit. I don't give a monkey's because the fundamental cause is the same.

It's us, folks.

Rasmussen: 61 percent say finding new energy sources is more important than conservation | Washington Examiner

It's hard to think of a public policy issue area in which America's 70/30 public opinion split between the Political Class and Mainstream Voters is more evident than in energy, a point driven home yet again by the latest results from Rasmussen Reports.