PJTV Takes on Big Green - By Greg Pollowitz - Planet Gore - National Review Online

Pajamas TV has a good video up on how taxpayers, through their Democratic enablers, are fueling the “Big Green” movement

Wind farms: yet another brewing disaster – Telegraph Blogs

As my source concedes, it could be an unfounded rumour. But does it not gel with everything else that we know about wind farms: that they’re one of the most misguided, ineffective, costly, wasteful, destructive, blighting, ugly, pointless and corruption-riddled form of power generation that ignorant governments, hysterical greens and rent-seeking businessmen have ever yet devised?

I’ve said this before, but it’s well worth repeating until the message gets through: is it not time we all started getting very, very angry about the wholly avoidable catastrophe we’re about to impose on our beautiful country and its citizens in pursuit of Chris Huhne’s insane delusion that we can somehow “harness the wind” to “combat climate” change?

Al's Journal : The Real Cost

Our addiction to oil has a real cost:

"Our friends at VoteVets released a TV ad of their own explaining why the oil companies are wrong. Narrated by a man who lost his brother in Iraq, the ad explains some of the real costs of our oil dependence: threats to national security and added danger to our troops overseas."  [What, nothing about CO2 giving us all kidney stones?!  If we burn more American coal, would that cause more wars in the Middle East?]

Quadrant Online - Climate Royal Commission

The simple fact is that the markets are actually, in a global sense, now not factoring in a price on carbon dioxide. Take the Chicago Carbon Exchange. After peaking at about $US7.50 per ton of carbon, it is now down to US5c, hardly a ringing endorsement of the argument that the market has factored in a price for carbon. Rather, the global market is factoring it out.

Warning Signs: No to the Cape Cod Wind Farm. Yes to Whaling Ships!

Why are Americans being literally forced to accept a form of energy abandoned more than a century ago?