Greenpeace and the Violent Video « NoFrakkingConsensus
Isn’t in fascinating that a big bad corporation like Sony appreciates how offensive this video is – yet the holier-than-thous at Greenpeace apparently don’t?[Settled science update]: Send More Money! | Real Science
Natural ups and downs that appear in climate data make detecting long-term trends challenging. Further study is neededSolar Max! 160 Spots | Real Science
Not!American Thinker: Analyze This, Sigmund: Your Great-Granddaughter Digs Child Sacrifice
...
Dec. 21, 2006: Evidence is mounting: the next solar cycle is going to be a big one.
Solar cycle 24, due to peak in 2010 or 2011 “looks like its going to be one of the most intense cycles since record-keeping began almost 400 years ago,” says solar physicist David Hathaway of the Marshall Space Flight Center.
Are you shocked to learn that Emma Freud and Richard Curtis are brazen hypocrites with a corpulent carbon footprint that includes four kids and three homes? But of course, it's your kids they want to sacrifice, not theirs (though someone might want to call Child Services on these two and make sure). Rest assured, the human sacrifice of you and yours will not disturb the compassionate couple as they enjoy their elegant townhouse in London and country estates in Suffolk and Oxfordshire.Ken Lay to California II: BLOCK the PROP (A.B. 32 is ‘Not a Sprint but a Marathon’) — MasterResource
Yesterday, Ken Lay urged climate action as a easy winner in benefits versus costs–something that was hardly true when he said it and known to be untrue now. Drastic action barely registers on the temperature/sea level/precipitation scale.
Here is Ken Lay again (with Roger Sant) a year later with more advice for California in its current debate over whether to pass California’s Prop. 23, a measure to suspend the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32).
No comments:
Post a Comment