Quadrant Online - Glaciergate meltdown

IPCC authors are a law unto themselves because they can cherry-pick sources, cite material of dubious quality and even provide false references. They also know that reviewers’ comments can be ignored and that no criticism can be expected from the IPCC Working Group.

The IPCC claims that there was a consensus but what kind of consensus was it when it is clear that the draft text was either never examined in detail or it was properly examined but no corrections were ever enforced?

It beggars belief to think that governments around the world intend spending billions, or even trillions, of dollars on the word of such a cowboy organization.

Extended peer community | Climate Etc.

Michael Lowe posted this comment on the Disagreement thread:

Wouldn’t it be great if more science was like this – hundreds of interested bloggers, laypeople and scientist interracting, arguing, disagreeing, learning. Maybe this is the real postnormal science!

Survey USA: Oberstar, Cravaack in dead heat for MN-08 seat « Hot Air

How long has it been since this district sent a Republican to the House? Sixty-four years. But the 8th CD has usually sent pro-life, fiscally conservative Democrats to Washington, which is exactly what Oberstar claimed to be. After not only voting for ObamaCare and cap-and-trade but lobbying other Democrats to do the same, 8th CD voters now know that they sent a Nancy Pelosi clone.