No more double standards | The SPPI Blog

When Republicans take control of the House of Representatives, their first order of business should be investigating the “manmade climate disaster” industry. They should subpoena federal employees and grant recipients, question them under oath regarding their funding and activities, and hold robust, public, expert debates on the science, economics, costs and supposed benefits of cap-tax-and-trade, carbon dioxide “endangerment,” ozone, and other punitive government policies that are strangling our nation’s energy and economic future.

They need to ensure that basic rules of honesty, transparency and accountability are finally applied as forcefully to regulators and taxpayer-funded scientists and activists, as to the rest of us.

Why AGW Is Logically Impossible « The Unbearable Nakedness of CLIMATE CHANG

Belief in AGW implies belief in a highly-improbable series of lucky discoveries and developments to happen just at the right time. That is called “Providence” and it is strong evidence for the existence of a Divine Being. But since such “evidence” is a contradiction in terms, then for catastrophic AGW to be happening right now, that’s a logical impossibility.

Die Klimazwiebel: Climate Change Skeptics: Strictly Science

But in order to determine if one is a skeptic or not it is necessary to agree on a definition for ‘skeptic’, an appropriate scale of measurement of skepticism and the threshold at which change occurs from healthy to non-healthy scientific skepticism.

If I do not agree 100% with something, then I am skeptical. The question is: ‘How skeptical must I be before I am given the label of skeptic?’