Orsekes, Readfearn: Got no evidence? Time for innuendo « JoNova

The battle cry: the “skeptics” are shills of big oil, has become an own goal. The PR team for the catastrophic theory have no new evidence of Big Oil funding and thousands of people now point out that the UNskeptics were paid 3500 times as much (at least). So they are moving on… the religiously devout believers can’t admit they were wrong, and nor can they look at the evidence, so what’s left? Post hoc random over-analysis of the irrelevant. Before, skeptics were paid hacks… and now they’re wrong because they … are ideologically against big government and regulation. From one ad hom to another.

Storm bringing winds, rain, snow to S. California

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- A storm arriving Sunday is expected to bring strong winds, periods of intense rain and snow to elevations as low as 3,500 feet.

Climate Activists’ Exaggerations Will Damage Environmentalism | Opinion | Epoch Times

Assertions that the multitude of scientists who worked on the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment reports agree that our greenhouse gas emissions are taking us to a planetary crisis are completely unfounded. John McLean has repeatedly demonstrated that only a few dozen scientist participants in the IPCC process even commented on the issue at all.