Are these floods really just a warmist’s “event”? | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

When warmists start describing these rains which they didn’t predict as the “extreme events” which they actually did, we see how a trick of language or definitions makes their theory unfalsifiable. “Extreme events” becomes the label that’s stuck on anything that doesn’t fit with what was predicted, to make it the exception that was predicted. And so no matter what happens, the warmist is always right.

EU Referendum: Questions may be asked

That the fair Louise uses the words "most respected" is interesting. Most respected by whom, one wonders – especially when Hansen's GISS, masquerading as NASA, is an object of derision to the average "denier". This appears to be the classic reliance on the power of "prestige" to bolster a failing case.

More IPCC Mischief « NoFrakkingConsensus

Report cites research accepted for publication 29 months after deadline