Thursday, January 06, 2011

Still more blithering idiocy from the New York Times: Justin Gillis wishes we had a 'detergent' that could get rid of trace amounts of vital atmospheric CO2?!

A Steady Dose of Atmospheric Detergent - NYTimes.com
To start the new year on a hopeful note, here is a piece of good news about the environment. A new study suggests that the level of a substance that acts as a kind of detergent in the atmosphere is a lot steadier than previously believed.
...
Unfortunately, the most important greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, is not one of those broken down by the hydroxyl radical.

2 comments:

blogagog said...

The theory of AGW predicted that you would write this post. Michael Mann told me.

pyeatte said...

This monumental display of ignorance disqualifies Gillis from touching AGW anytime.