Challenge to you, my dear climate change deniers (2)
13) Meanwhile, a small, almost infinitesimal group of public deniers continue to lie about all this and are treated with respect and reverence by the mostly Republican, conservative business, political and media community. And again the public media refuses to point out the fact that not a single study has been published in the last 20 years that refutes the three basic points that AGW is real, is us and is bad. We also know that it will become steadily worse as we allow the deniers to keep us in this permanent state of delay and inaction.
...
15) Meanwhile, we have had well over 20,000 studies published since 1971 (40 years!), almost all of which lead us to the inevitable conclusions that I have repeatedly stated. People are dying now due to AGW and we know that many millions of lives are at risk in the future as we sit on our hands and focus on other less inconsequential matters.
There is NO DEBATE within the scientific community on these points. For years, I have searched and challenged others to find scientific studies published in the mainstream science journals that refute these basic points.
Posts
1 comment:
After a day, the original owner of this blog - Doug Craig - is still MIA, though the comments are being dominated by one poster named Randy in defense of Mr. Craig's original post. As copious in quantity and verbose as Randy's comments are, he still is not posting any actual empirical evidence for his or Mr. Craig's challenge. This is exactly what raises red flags about their views. If there is such a strong consensus or non-debatable science, why don't they just show the empirical evidence rather than continue to TELL US ABOUT the empirical evidence and the "overwhelming majority" of scientists who have it in their possession. If they have it, why then don't they post it.
Post a Comment