Monday, February 21, 2011

The Migrant Mind: More weird corrections
These total correction curves clearly show that the climatologists think that the raw data is as many as 3-5 degrees in error, which is why they correct it that much, yet they tell us that the observations are good enough to measure to the accuracy of a tenth of a degree. I always learned that if you have to make a degree correction, you can't claim that you have tenth of a degree precision.
Penny Wong: sceptics are flat-earthers | Australian Climate Madness
This nonsensical comment utterly incensed me. She hasn't moved on one inch in her understanding of the climate debate. Her robotic response to any challenge to her "faith" in the global warming consensus is the same as it always was.
Bill McKibben Says It’s Urgent « NoFrakkingConsensus
But there’s nothing remotely safe about dying of hypothermia – or from a fall after slipping on ice. A cooler planet is not a planet that is friendly to humans, vegetation, or animals. There’s a reason tropical forests and lush biodiversity are closely related. There’s a reason people retire to the south of France rather than to Iceland – to Arizona and Florida rather than to Alaska.

No matter how urgently McKibben (or The Nation which gave him a platform last week) insist on talking nonsense, ordinary people aren’t that easily fooled.
Quadrant Online - The ethanol scam
Of all the evils which the Environmentalists have foisted on the world, there seems little doubt that the campaign to replace petrol and diesel with “bio-fuels”, eg ethanol, made from cereal crops such as maize and wheat, or from sugar made from cane and beet, tops the list.

No comments: