A special report on feeding the world: No easy fix | The Economist
Global warming upsets the world’s water cycle, increases the burden of pests, desiccates soil and reduces yields. In 2010 the world got an unpleasant taste of what climate change might bring.Feb. 2011: Overheated world update: India heading towards record wheat crop
...
But a lot else is happening. An increase of 2°C in global temperatures, says Hans-Joachim Braun, the head of CIMMYT’s wheat programme, could cause a 20% fall in wheat yields. This would exceed any possible gains from warming in areas currently too cold to grow crops and would also offset the benefits of rising carbon-dioxide concentrations. Plants eat CO2, so if there is more of it in the atmosphere, photosynthesis should increase and yields rise. But no one knows by how much.
...
When the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) tried to work out the impacts of climate change on the main cereal crops, almost all its results suggested that yields in 2050 are likely to be lower than they were in 2000, sometimes much lower. Almost half the forecasts showed yield reductions of 9-18% by 2050. One came up with a drop in rainfed-maize yields of 30%. The most vulnerable crop turned out to be wheat, with the largest losses forecast in developing countries. The Indo-Gangetic plain, home to a seventh of mankind and purveyor of a fifth of the world’s wheat, is likely to be especially hard hit.
India, the world's second biggest wheat producer after China, is heading towards harvesting a record 81.47 million tonnes of the produce in the 2010-11 crop year.
1 comment:
The effect of different CO2 levels on plant growth is well known. At 200ppm photosynthesis stops altogether. Above this figure photosynthesis increases in line with CO2 levels up to the optimum of 1000ppm, so at the present level of c.380ppm we are comfortably above the minimum, but well below the optimum. As well as increased plant growth, higher levels of CO2 make the plants more disease resistant and drought tolerant.
As a biologist, I don't need a lecture from an economist on photosynthesis, as I wouldn't presume to lecture him on economics
Post a Comment