The New Nostradamus of the North: Germany: Environmentalism gone mad
Why a “Revenue Neutral” Energy Tax Isn’t | Watts Up With That?
[Der Spiegel] That's the worst aspect: some major environmental policies aren't just ineffective -- they are counterproductive."2000 : NYT Declares 1962 To Be “50 Million Years Ago” | Real Science1962 : Nuclear Subs Almost Collided At The North Pole | Real Science
---
In the fight to protect the environment, it may be time to pause and ask oneself: what is really helping, and what isn't? And to admit at times: sorry, we were wrong. But it doesn't work like that. Environmentalism knows no doubt. The idea is never wrong, the problem is always in the implementation.
And so it will continue.
Why a “Revenue Neutral” Energy Tax Isn’t | Watts Up With That?
Why will the economy slow? If we have the same amount of goods at higher prices, demand will fall and the economy will slow. It’s basic economics.
And that’s why a “revenue-neutral” energy tax isn’t neutral at all … and more to the point, it’s one reason why taxing energy in any form is a really dumb idea. Even when it’s revenue-neutral it slows the economic cycle, and when it’s not revenue-neutral, it slows it even more.
w.
PS - In addition, an energy tax is a very regressive tax. An extra $10 energy tax for the energy used to commute to work means little to the CEO, but may break the bank of the janitor. Taxing energy is a bad plan for a host of reasons.
No comments:
Post a Comment