CRU Refuses FOI Request for Yamal Climategate Chronology « Climate Audit
Probably no single issue damages the reputation of the climate science community more than the refusal to show the data that supports their work, even under an FOI request. The public believes that scientists who purport to be concerned about the future of the planet should not place their own financial interests, including future grants, ahead of this concern, particularly when their research has been done with public funds.Skeptic's Corner: A case of the vapors
...
Not only did East Anglia refuse my request for the regional chronology, they even refused to identify the sites. The University claimed that even identifying the sites would result in “financial harm” to the university though an adverse impact on their “ability to attract research funding”. See here.
there is no scientifically verifiable proof of the enhanced greenhouse effect upon which the global warming theory depends and on which billions of dollars have been spent.Ben Santer elected AGU fellow | Watts Up With That?
No mention if he threatened to “beat the crap out of” the judges /sarcThe Little Chu-Chu That Couldn’t | Real Science
Chu tries to claim that North Slope oil formed at low latitudes and later drifted north. In fact, the oil deposits formed when the climate was much warmer, and at about the same latitude where they are now.WWF’s Chief Spokesperson Joins IPCC « NoFrakkingConsensus
Morgan is not one of the world finest scientific minds. She is a professional activist.
No comments:
Post a Comment