Video: Interview with warmist Chris Field

The Economist posted an interview with IPCC’s Chris Field. Dr Chris Field, co-chair of working group 2 of the IPCC (which is assessing climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability), discussed the role of the IPCC and their recent findings.

He corrected the insinuation that the IPCC has political or other agendas outside their mandate of providing information about climate change that is policy relevant not prescriptive.

He also said that, “Agriculture, and food security more broadly, are kind of at the center of what I think of as a perfect storm.”

Nothing will change until greens mount some primary challenges and collect some scalps | Grist

Nobody in D.C., with the possible exception of coastal liberal pols like Barbara Boxer, has any reason at all to fear the wrath of green groups. In fact, green group wrath -- expressed in grumpy TV adds, PR releases, and internet petitions -- generally serves as a badge of pride in districts to the right of, say, Bernie Sanders'. It makes a pol look "moderate."
...
The problem is that greens have been playing the top-down game badly. And it's not from lack of money -- depending on how you tally it up, they spent between $200 million and $300 million just in the last year or so on the climate-bill battle. That's more than enough money to do some damage, if it's spent well.

Greenpeace assault on coal finance « Green Hell Blog

Check out this assault on an Australian Bank for their involvement with the mining industry that quite literally sustains the country:

Maslowski Decides To Stick His Fingers In The Fire Again | Real Science

In 2008, Maslowski predicted an ice free Arctic prior to 2013. That proved to be one of the dumbest predictions of the year, so he just predicted it again.