FrontPage Magazine » Why I’m a Global Warming Skeptic

No matter how you look at the issue – which is why the alarmists are so determined to never allow you to actually look at the issue – anyone who thinks must be skeptical of the claims of the hysterics. The science is new, its models based on utterly unverifiable numbers (i.e. the temperature in Guam in the year 8), the accuracy of its long term predictions obviously impossible to know, its short-term predictions having utterly failed to come to be (e.g. that decade-and-a-half long hiatus in global warming.) The behaviors of the hysterical scientists are unscientific, the behavior of the hysteric’s favorite celebrities contradictory to those someone who truly believed would be engaging in. If you follow the money it is almost entirely into the pockets of the hysterics while the proposed “remedy” does not seem to be those that would be proposed by people who believed the end is near. In fact, what the remedy does suggest – what the entire industry of the hysterics suggests – is that “manmade global warming” is a leftist farce being perpetrated by cynics who recognize there’s riches to be had, along with power and fame.

James Lovelock wins Observer lifetime achievement at ethical awards | Environment | guardian.co.uk

He has been at the forefront of dire predictions about the consequences of global warming. "Before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate is tolerable," he wrote in 2006.

Obama's audacity of incompetence: GOP must sieze on his dismal record

Even the failed attempt at cap-and-trade - government control of energy pricing - shows Obama's determination to fundamentally transform America. And he is sure to try again to complete his coveted European-style social-democratic project if you give him four more years.