Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Tim Flannery's all at sea on climate snow job | thetelegraph.com.au
AGAIN I must ask: if global warming is so clear a threat, why all these deceits?
If Elected (A Fantasy)
I would make shutting down the Environmental Protection Agency a priority. It is a rogue agency that appears to think it is not accountable to Congress or the American people. It is filled with fanatics who have no regard for real science. It is costing the nations jobs and thwarting our energy needs. If I was President there would be no further mention of “global warming” or “climate change.” The climate is always changing; it’s called “the seasons” or “warming and cooling cycles.” There will be no regulation of carbon dioxide. That’s a scam.
Shell Executive Criticizes Renewable Subsidies, Backs Carbon [Dioxide Scam] - FoxBusiness.com
Pickard, who has criticized the carbon tax part of the proposal before, said Australia is the second-biggest carbon emitter per head of population after the United Arab Emirates, and needs to introduce a price on carbon sooner rather than later.

"We believe that the most efficient way to do this is to introduce a cap-and-trade emissions trading scheme...in which a price signal will lead to behavioral change and therefore emissions reductions," Pickard said.
Carbon International LLCNow Registered By Climate ActionReserve - Press Release - Digital Journal
Carbon International LLC, a leading provider of carbon [dioxide swindle] trading solutions and other environmental management services, today announced it has been registered by the Climate Action Reserve, one of North America’s leading repositories of greenhouse gas emission projects.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

From the LLCNow article:

"Under California’s AB 32 law, major emitters in the state are required to offset their greenhouse gas impact by purchasing carbon offsets credits.

In less than two years, Carbon International has reserved more than 150 carbon credit valuation projects in North America, Costa Rica, Honduras and South America."

Translation: Us Californians will be paying higher energy prices and part of these higher prices will be redistributed to Costa Rica, Honduras, and South America. In short, it's simply a method of North-South wealth redistribution sought after when the NIEO was in vogue.