Abbott: ad campaign is "taxpayer-funded propaganda" | Australian Climate Madness

As I posted earlier, the one thing that won’t even be mentioned in Labor’s adverts for “climate action” is the climate.

From the Bolt Report today | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog

Costello on John Howard’s overreaction to the global warming scare, and how Julia Gillard can never sell her tax.

The Reference Frame: Carbon indulgences: AUD 23 per ton

If the carbon tax were supposed to make a difference, it would have to be $700-$1,400 per ton. In that case, most of the world population would go extinct because just for breathing, an average human would have to pay $300-$700 per year of a carbon tax. For billions of people, such an annual fee would automatically mean that they will starve to death. If someone wants to remove most of the human contribution to the warming in the 21st century - something like 0.5 °C - by a carbon tax, he will surely have to introduce a carbon tax that will kill billions of people.

Is that really a good decision? Or is it legitimate to charge the people who promote carbon regulation with their planned crimes against humanity?

septic - Google Search

[Isn't it clever when Wikipedia climate hoax promoter William M. Connolley repeatedly refers to us as "septics"?]