Alarmists Need To Get Their Personal Attacks Synced Better | Real Science
Dessler says that Spencer’s model matches the data, but it is still wrong.Twitter / @Revkin: Building on his own PV exp ...
...
Arthur Smith says that Spencer mismatches the data by a few trillion degrees.
Building on his own PV experience, Jim Hansen runs US & global numbers & pops the renewables-as-cliimate-fix balloon: j.mp/JHrenewWeek in review 7/30/11 | Climate Etc.
Alarming(!) news
Yahoo.news posted a story from the Associated Press entitled “Northeast Braces for Temperatures Near Boiling Point” (h/t Angela Fritz.) It seems that the confused 100F with 100C. Here’s a book idea for Chris Mooney: “Unscientific reporters and editors”
Posts
1 comment:
The main point of Spencer's paper is that the observed outgoing radiation flux does not match the climate models. Spencer may have a model to explain the discrepancy, but that is irrelevant. So Dessler, Trenberth, and others concentrate on the irrelevant part and ignore the real story. The real story is the climate models are wrong.
Their whole critical approach is a diversion - watch the thimble.
Post a Comment