Saturday, July 16, 2011

Articles: The Global Warming Hoax: How Soon We Forget
There are millions of smart people out there who have been bombarded with this global warming nonsense for so long that they've actually come to believe it. The old adage that if you tell a lie often enough it becomes the truth happens to be true, especially when the people don't get to hear other points of view, something our mainstream media has made sure of over the last few decades.

But even though people are slowly growing skeptical about it, and turning away from the mainstream media, we can't afford to let our guard down about this scam. And we'll never truly defeat it for good by arguing against it based on the enormous costs involved. Whether it's global warming, or global cooling, or ocean acidification, we need to denounce this madness as the outrageous lie that it is, if we're ever going to defeat this hydra in all of its various guises.
He says, she says in a faux election campaign
''HOW do you measure how much emissions we're using? How would you do that?'' It's a question at the heart of Julia Gillard's campaign to deliver Australia a clean energy future, yet the vast majority of people the Prime Minister is asking to support her price on carbon would have no idea how carbon dioxide emissions are calculated.
...
''It's actually pretty hard to do this because carbon dioxide is invisible and it's weightless and you can't smell it,'' Abbott began, projecting frankness.

''So it's not something that you can just look at and say: 'Yeah, we can quantify that'.''

He went on to paint a vivid and troubling word picture, raising the spectre of an ''army'' of ''carbon policemen'' rampaging around the country with clipboards, attempting to measure something that was ''neither easy nor accessible'', and making life difficult for business.
Where science has gone wrong | ScottishSceptic
And then along came “global warming” or “climate change”. Suddenly, you could begin to repeat all the research. Not: “the lifecycle of the lesser spotted goat-toad”, but “the effect of climate change on the lifecycle of the less spotted goat-toad”. So, the last thing anyone in the science community wanted to do was to undermine the goose that laid the golden egg. They knew climate “science” wasn’t exactly hard science, but what did they care so long as the grants kept coming in?

No comments: