Der Spiegel On Monnett – Shoddy Scientist Who Is A Victim Of An Intrigue
Finally, past the half way point of the piece, Der Spiegel points out that Monnett’s scientific work was indeed sloppy and grossly lacked data:Indeed the hated scientist had to admit last winter in a hearing that hardly any documentation for viewing the dead polar bears exists. There were no clear photos. The animals also did not show up in any official datasets of the expedition.”Der Spiegel also noticed that the peer review was everything but rigorous, the paper sailed through the process with hardly any scrutiny:In the publication of the Polar Biology article, it appears no one was disturbed by this. Even in-house reviewers in Monnett’s office as well as three anonymous peer reviewers of the journal simply waved the paper through with only slight modifications.”
1 comment:
"... as well as three anonymous peer reviewers of the journal simply waved the paper through with only slight modifications.”
It really is incredible! So much for the peer review process!
Post a Comment