The Global Warming Debate Al Gore Refused To Have | NewsBusters.org
Also made clear by this debate was exactly why the alarmists want the public to believe the science is settled: when presented with someone that actually knows the facts, they look foolish.When Mr. Heat Comes To Washington - Patrick Michaels - Climate of Fear - Forbes
And this, of course, was why Gore got House Democrats in April 2009 to refuse to allow Monckton to appear with him.
Although Gore likely would have done a better job than Denniss, he would have been no match for the far more knowledgable and eloquent Monckton, and the entire myth the former Vice President has been profitably spreading since 2006 would have crumbled - with C-SPAN cameras broadcasting every delicious second - like a house of cards.
For those that have never seen Monckton speak, you now know why he was prevented to face Gore two years ago, and why the Nobel laureate has continually refused a standing debate offer from this British Lord.
what we are seeing is minor, weenie, dinky—compared to the great eastern heatwave of July and August 1930.Al Gore keeps pushing the global warming hoax - pottsmerc.com
To see the real magnitude of the heat, check out the 1930 temperatures far away from DC’s urban core. Down at McCormick Observatory in Charlottesville, which has several hundred feet of elevation on Washington (and therefore should be a couple of degrees cooler), the daily highs, beginning on July 19, were 103, 107, 106, 105, 97, 92, 102, 104, 93, 103, 106, 90, 95, 91, 97, 101, 106, 102, 90, 100, 99, 105 and 98.
To the $100 billion sought annually for Third World "green" initiatives, might you ask, "Do you expect me to believe that some two-bit dictator is not going to pocket that cash?" When a movement brings together ethanol hoaxers, GE, the Marxist President of Bolivia and academicians prepared to embellish research, the common thread is not environmental protection but a globalized lining of pockets and redistribution of wealth.
No comments:
Post a Comment