RealClimate: “Misdiagnosis of Surface Temperature Feedback”
Guest commentary by Kevin Trenberth and John Fasullo
...it is evident that this paper did not get an adequate peer review. It should not have been published.
...
The bottom line is that there is NO merit whatsoever in this paper.
Posts
3 comments:
Clearly, adequate peer review would have been the folks who checked out the polar bear study.
We saw some bears. A week later we saw some bears that looked dead. Maybe drowned. There was a storm. Global warming is killing polar bears. QED
The bottom line is that the entire body of work by climate "scientists" has NO MERIT whatsover.
Ken Trenberth and Romm, Wow, no ****.
There's two lads who you can really trust to tell you the truth.
Post a Comment