Testing the Entire Suite of IPCC AR4 Models | Climate Realists

Furtado et al. conclude that "for implications on future climate change, the coupled climate models show no consensus on projected future changes in frequency of either the first or second leading pattern of North Pacific SST anomalies," and they say that "the lack of a consensus in changes in either mode also affects confidence in projected changes in the overlying atmospheric circulation." In addition, they note that the lack of consensus they find "mirrors parallel findings in changes in ENSO behavior conducted by van Oldenborgh et al. (2005), Guilyardi (2006) and Merryfield (2006)," and they state that these significant issues "most certainly impact global climate change predictions." And, we would add, they impact them in a highly negative way.

Carnegie-Mellon study: Marcellus shale gas... - Revkin.net

Carnegie-Mellon study: Marcellus shale gas greenhouse impact 20-50% less than coal.

Damned lies and statistics | [Amy Domini thinks the debate is about whether the climate is changing, rather than about what is *causing* the changes]

Now I know a few facts that prove to me that the climate is changing.   

'Happy' Bhutan alarmed by Himalayan climate change | My Sinchew

For Bhutan, the change in river water flows caused by colder, drier winters and warmer, wetter summers is particularly alarming.

Aggie Joke : Dessler Has A Plan To End The Drought In Texas | Real Science

Does this guy honestly believe that the Governor has the power to end the drought?