Climate Spin of the Week: Mark Dreyfus | Australian Climate Madness
Could you be any more economical with the truth? Dreyfus’ statement is utter nonsense. The Copenhagen accord is non-binding and is barely worth the paper it is printed on, so to say they have “pledged” is simply weasel words for talking big to get a shaky agreement. The US, China and India (which make up nearly 50% of emissions globally) are doing NOTHING. Yeah, maybe China is making the right noises about cutting carbon intensity, but absolute emissions will continue to rise for decades. Ditto India. And the US is more worried about GFC Mk II than tackling climate change. The claims made by Dreyfus just don’t hold up.Biomass vs. Fossil Fuels: Thinking of CO2 Emissions in Terms of Nature’s “Battery” — MasterResource
Biomass may be renewable, politically correct, and fossil-fuel displacing. But it is unlikely to reduce atmospheric CO2 concentrations much, if at all.How to get Expelled from School - Ian Plimer - $29.95
HOW TO GET EXPELLED FROM SCHOOL:Why climate alarmism isn’t toppled by cock-ups | Tim Black | spiked
A guide to climate change for pupils, parents and punters
...
Foreword by Václav Klaus
It will take more than exposés of scientific errors to dent green miserabilism, because its roots are moralistic rather than scientific.
No comments:
Post a Comment