Defending Heartland, Climate Realists, ICSC, and even The New York Times from Media Matters

MP #6: “And at no point did the article explain who Tom Harris is or why he was quoted evaluating statements about science instead of, say, a climate scientist.”

Response: I work with many of the world’s leading climate experts and, as someone with an advanced technical/science degree and 30+ years of experience in technical/scientific topics (mainly thermo-fluids—thermodynamics, fluid mechanics and heat transfer), I have the training required to read and evaluate many of the science papers and reports and formulate informed opinions, even though I do not do the research myself. Contrast my background with Al Gore, or any of the Executive Directors of the various groups promoting the climate scare who are often cited in mass media.
...
Attacks like this one from “Media Matters for America” give climate realists an important benchmark. As bomber pilots in the air force used to say in World War II, “You get the most flack when you are over the target.” We must be doing something right to warrant this attention from those who apparently want to censor the important climate debate to include only one point of view.

Wind power: a policy spinning out of control - Telegraph

Telegraph View: The Government's policy on renewable energy is based on dogma not evidence.

Wind farm paid £1.2 million to produce no electricity - Telegraph

A wind farm has been paid £1.2 million not to produce electricity for eight-and-a-half hours.