Reply to article: Kenneth Haapala: Response to: A Map of Organized Climate Change Denial by Andrew Revkin | Climate Realists

Revkin reveals his bias by his sources. The reference to the statement: “That there are such well-financed and coordinated efforts is not contentious.” is an article dated April 26, 1998. The article describes a draft plan, which, if implemented, had a media relations budget of $600,000 to fight adoption of the Kyoto Treaty. This is hardly compelling evidence of heavy funding. Revkin presents no evidence that the plan was funded or implemented. [See Article below]

By comparison, the GAO reported the US has spent $31 Billion Climate Science. This has gone to the promoters of global warming. Yet, the US has failed to produce a scientific study assessing global warming that meets the standards of the Data Quality Act of 2000.

September Leaf/Volt Sales « The Daily Bayonet

Congratulations to Nissan for owning GM yet again, but the prediction about selling 500,000 EV’s a year by 2013 still looks wildly optimistic.

World Climate Report » Malaria Declines Despite Local Warming

“Spreading tropical disease” is high on the list of bad things that are going to happen as the world warms—if you believe the doomsayers. And topping their list of spreading tropical diseases is malaria.

But, as we have on many past occasions pointed out, malaria is neither “tropical” nor is it “spreading.”

Quadrant Online - Questions for the Chief Scientist

Science is not a democracy. Scientific knowledge does not advance by consensus. It does not advance at all if statements and hypotheses claimed to be scientific are, in a fundamental sense, unfalsifiable; or if they make predictions (or projections) so distant, ambiguous or absurd they are meaningless.