Sen. Inhofe: Obama's EPA Waging War on Fossil Fuels - HUMAN EVENTS

“The President of the United States wants to destroy American energy,” said Oklahoma GOP Sen. James Inhofe, the ranking member of the Senate Energy and Public Works Committee. “His intention is to kill fossil fuels, which we rely on for 99% of the energy in America.

“All of this killing of our energy supply is not by accident. It’s on purpose.”

According to Inhofe, the administration’s proposed CO2/greenhouse gas-emission regulations—due out in November—could chop $300 billion to $400 billion alone off the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) each year. Estimates from the Senate Energy and Public Works Committee's Republican staff estimates this regulation could cost in excess of the 2 million jobs that would have been lost as a result of Waxman-Markey Climate Change Bill.

Eco-Radicalism 101: Capitalists Killing Mother Earth ... and Bambi - HUMAN EVENTS

Say goodbye to Mother Earth, kiddos! It won’t be around much longer because of all the toxic pounds of carbon dioxide Leonardo DiCaprio produces zipping around the planet in his private jet we evil humans are pumping into the atmosphere by filling our gas guzzlers at the pump. Well, if you’re a toddler, chances are you’ve heard something to that effect from your Al Gore wannabe teacher.

It’s eco-radicalism, and as Marybeth Hicks points out in her new book, children are the target. “My daughter had to watch a movie called Human Footprint in her science class,” says Marybeth. “It should have been called the big bad evil anti-corporation, anti-capitalism footprint because that’s what the movie was about.”

"Real"Climate: Global warming and ocean heat content

What they found was that decades with cooling surface temperatures consistently had higher-than-average increases in ocean heat content.

Where is Science? « Climate Change

ENSO is not climate neutral. ENSO is the reality of climate change in action. The progression towards cooling that is evident in the increasing pressure differential between Tahiti and Darwin shows no sign of abating. The ENSO state changes not only on an inter-annual time scale but on very much longer time scales. ENSO is plainly not ‘climate neutral’.

If we look back at figure 1 we will see that the Southern Oscillation Index leads the change in tropical sea surface temperature on the upswing and the downswing. The SOI is more positive (cooling) in 2011 than it has been at any time over the last sixty years.

Until the IPCC can properly account for ENSO cycles they can not ascribe climate change to ‘change in trace gas composition due to the works of man’. We see an excellent correlation between surface pressure and surface temperature and no correlation at all between trace gas concentration and surface temperature.

Where is Science?