- Bishop Hill blog - Blackening the name of the BBC
Richard Black briefs colleagues on covering climate change.Book Sightings & an Invite to Germany « NoFrakkingConsensus
[11-min video]
He is quite a piece of work isn't he?
Six weeks ago I was invited to become a regular contributor to the Canadian version of the The Huffington Post. To the immense credit of its new Managing Editor, Danielle Crittenden, the offer remained firm even after she learned what my book is about. (The Huffington Post is so closely aligned with the standard environmentalist worldview it has a permanent section labeled Green.) Yesterday, an excerpt of my book appeared on The Huffington Post and I am hard at work on my first blog post for that venue which will be titled Why I’m a Climate Skeptic.A level playing field | Australian Climate Madness
“The alarmists have power over our lives.” That is the key point that differentiates the alarmists from the sceptics. If we reverse the situation, with the consensus position being that the likelihood of catastrophic climate change is minuscule and in any event climate mitigation is practically useless, and the sceptics arguing that we should turn our economies upside down to counter what they allege to be a real risk, spending billions of dollars which could be otherwise spent on alleviating poverty or disease, which side of this hypothetical argument would be subjected to the greater scrutiny?Extreme measures: The push to make climate research relevant | Climate Spectator
I am not suggesting such uneven scrutiny, merely a level playing field. But at the moment, we are a very long way from that.
"There's this very strong connection between attribution and prediction," noted Stott, who spoke on these issues before colleagues last week at the World Climate Research Programme conference here in Denver.
No comments:
Post a Comment