Met Office Forced To Release Raw Data
After the “barbecue summer” washout and the mild winter that turned to deep freeze, the apparent inability of the Met Office to predict the weather has become something of a national joke. Now people will get the chance to find out just how easy forecasting actually is. Under government plans to be announced tomorrow, the Met Office is to be forced to release its raw data so that others can draw their own conclusions.
James Delingpole: Climategate 2.0 - WSJ.com
Last week, 5,000 files of private email correspondence among several of the world's top climate scientists were anonymously leaked onto the Internet. Like the first "climategate" leak of 2009, the latest release shows top scientists in the field fudging data, conspiring to bully and silence opponents, and displaying far less certainty about the reliability of anthropogenic global warming theory in private than they ever admit in public.
The scientists include men like Michael Mann of Penn State University and Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia, both of whose reports inform what President Obama has called "the gold standard" of international climate science, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Twitter / @MichaelEMann: Murdoch empire (e.g. http: ...
Murdoch empire (e.g. huff.to/tvZrxg) stoops to using Delingpole (bit.ly/rJWtBu) to push #CRUHack2 attack: on.wsj.com/u6XQyO
The damage estimate in Connecticut alone from the unseasonal snowstorm that hit the northeast on October 29th has been put at $3 billion.
An incredible 32 inches (818mm) of snow was dumped on the area – by far the largest volume since a legendary snow hurricane in 1804.
...But Prof John Sweeney of NUI Maynooth, who has contributed to IPCC reports, said last month’s floods in the Dublin area were consistent with climate computer models.
No comments:
Post a Comment