Muller Discovers The True Meaning Of Peer Review | Real Science
The peer review process in climate science is completely broken, with junk science pouring through cracks in logic as wide as the Grand Canyon. A bunch of imbeciles carelessly reviewing the work of other imbeciles.BEST statistics show hot air doesn’t rise off concrete! « JoNova: Science, carbon, climate and tax
However, Muller has discovered that there are people who take review of his work seriously.
If there is anything skeptics are guilty of, it’s being too naive, too trusting, too willing to believe that their own strong moral compass is replicated in others.Peltier: Political Solar’s ‘Epic Fail’–With More to Come — MasterResource
There are people who are compulsive liars. Their moral compass tells them the ends justifies the means, and it’s OK to pretend to be a skeptic in order to get a headline pushing your favourite religion. It’s ok to release press releases about half-baked conclusions, and claim you aren’t trying to get media attention, and then disagree with the conclusions you stated yesterday. You are trying to save the world, lies are “forgiveable”.
“Given the many other companies with shaky financials that have received loan guarantees, I expect we’ll see more and larger epic fails like Solyndra in the coming years.”UN : Earth Passed Away Eleven Years Ago | Real Science
- Robert Peltier, “Epic Fail, POWER, October 2011, p. 6.
[1989] A senior environmental official at the United Nations, Noel Brown, says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000.
No comments:
Post a Comment