Warmist Phil Jones on the problem with skeptics: "They mostly look at observation papers and ignore modelling ones, as they believe by default models are wrong!"
Some of the most hardcore deniers even prefer looking at thermometers over watching the Day After Tomorrow even though the latter shows the true nature of the global warming armageddon theory. The movie shows it much more accurately than what any instrument will ever able to do. ;-)
Phil Jones, where in the literature have models been tested and validated? Which ones are dead-on accurate? Models are like psychic predictions. Over the course of time, some will be shown to have been correct and many not correct. The fact that some were correct and most not renders even the correct ones useless if we can't validate them before the alleged event. So, I repeat my question: where in the literature are the models tested and validated?
3 comments:
Some of the most hardcore deniers even prefer looking at thermometers over watching the Day After Tomorrow even though the latter shows the true nature of the global warming armageddon theory. The movie shows it much more accurately than what any instrument will ever able to do. ;-)
What does Phil Jones think of the models?
see 2711 and 5262
Phil Jones, where in the literature have models been tested and validated? Which ones are dead-on accurate? Models are like psychic predictions. Over the course of time, some will be shown to have been correct and many not correct. The fact that some were correct and most not renders even the correct ones useless if we can't validate them before the alleged event. So, I repeat my question: where in the literature are the models tested and validated?
Post a Comment