Wednesday, January 25, 2012

- Bishop Hill blog - Climate scientists want no oversight

"...seeking to criminalize the peer review process by obtaining internal editorial comments of reviewers as a means to impeach or impugn scientists"? Huh?

It can't be said often enough. If you want public money you have to accept public oversight.

A Legal Defense Fund for Climate Scientists - NYTimes.com

Knowledge Bank: The Climate Science Defense Fund will serve as a clearinghouse for information related to legal actions taken against scientists. Our goal is to provide lawyers representing scientists with information about past cases and strategies.

The Reference Frame: Sustainable conference in Rio finds AGW panic unsustainable

Reuters: Environmentalists throwing global warming under the bus

House Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans Press Release :: SAY WHAT???? President Obama Still Singing the Same Tune on Solyndra, Refuses to Accept Responsibility

If the Obama administration had listened to its own experts who predicted Solyndra’s woes, taxpayers would not be on the hook for over half a billion dollars

Coyote Blog » Blog Archive » Sense of Scale — Keystone XL vs. Wind

this one single pipeline, out of many, is several times larger than the entire wind power sector.

No comments: