date: Fri Apr 28 17:04:18 2006 from: Tim Osborn
subject: Fwd: Re: Ruherford et al 2005 to: Keith Briffa
And here's a separate email from McIntyre. I'm not sure that we can tell Science that we do *not* want to issue a correction to our paper and at the same time tell McIntyre that he cannot make public the fact that we used CRUTEM2v rather than HadCRUT2 as I stated in the online supplement. Perhaps we should wait and see if Science are happy with us not issuing a correction; if they are happy with this, then I guess McIntyre should be allowed to make public our response, even though he will no doubt gloat and make hay with it. Cheers Tim
Ground zero for sea level rise?
20 minutes ago