Because how can we be critical of Crowley for throwing out 40-years in the
middle of his calibration, when we're throwing out all post-1960 data 'cos the MXD has a
non-temperature signal in it, and also all pre-1881 or pre-1871 data 'cos the
temperature data may have a non-temperature signal in it! If we write the
Holocene forum article then we'll have to be critical or our paper as well as
How About Focusing On Actual Pollutants?
57 minutes ago