Email 4758, UEA's Tim Osborn, Oct 2000: "how can we be critical of Crowley for throwing out 40-years in the middle of his calibration, when we're throwing out all post-1960 data 'cos the MXD has a non-temperature signal in it, and also all pre-1881 or pre-1871 data 'cos the temperature data may have a non-temperature signal in it! "

Email 4758

Because how can we be critical of Crowley for throwing out 40-years in the
middle of his calibration, when we're throwing out all post-1960 data 'cos the MXD has a
non-temperature signal in it, and also all pre-1881 or pre-1871 data 'cos the
temperature data may have a non-temperature signal in it! If we write the
Holocene forum article then we'll have to be critical or our paper as well as
Crowley's!