I’ve been Lenfesteyed | Watts Up With That?

It is notable when poets consider themselves qualified to pronounce “climate truth”, and to pronounce others as being “mad” for having a differing opinion but people with backgrounds in mathematics (Monckton) and meteorology (myself) are not. Oh, the ironing.

The CLIMATE SCEPTICS Blog: Legless and Powerless in the Global Storms?

Australia’s wealth and jobs have always rested on three legs – mining and farming, making and processing things, and rich foreigners; in short, resources, manufacturing, and money from tourists and investors.

The Gillard carbon tax will white-ant all three legs.

EU Referendum: Carbon democracy

It is probably fair to say that the scientific case for climate change has been shredded – and as a popular cause, support has disappeared. It thus shows how totally detached our masters have become that they delivered in December, while no one was really looking, their 220-page "Carbon Plan", with the aim of "Delivering our low carbon future".

Frozen Nome Running Out Of Fuel | Real Science

Brain-dead global warmers hope to end fossil fuel usage to save the Arctic ice, while Alaskans hope that fossil fuel can be delivered through the ice – to keep from freezing to death.

Computers Incapable of Modeling Climate: Billions Wasted To Perpetuate Deception

Billions of taxpayers dollars are wasted on politically motivated climate science, most of it on buying and running computers incapable of modeling global climate. They’re incorrectly programmed so a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase to fulfill the saying “Garbage In, Garbage Out” (GIGO). In the real world, temperature increases before CO2, but the programmers need a political result. Naturally the temperature forecasts are consistently wrong, but that doesn’t matter. They claim they’re getting better and all they need are bigger, faster computers. It won’t and can’t make any difference, but they continue to waste money.

Dr Phil, Confidential Agent: Re-visited « Climate Audit

At this time, CRU and East Anglia have made so many different and inconsistent stories that it is impossible to draw any conclusions on the existence and language of their confidential agreements without a competent investigation to clear the air. It’s too bad that there hasn’t been one.