The Carbon Sense Coalition » The Future for "Carbon Sense"

Why was this battle against climate alarmism all over the world largely led by the oldies? Here are a few reasons:

Mr. Worthing: The Truth
[cartoon]

Confusing Climate Study Actually Makes Strong Case Against Tar Sands -- If We Want To Avoid Catastrophic Global Warming | ThinkProgress

Bottom Line: In the world we must strive to achieve, however difficult or implausible it may seem today, expanded extraction of the tar sands has no place.

WSJ: The Not-So-Vast Conspiracy | JunkScience.com

Stolen documents show the tiny budget of global warming skeptics.

The Wall Street Journal editorial is below.

Heartland « Climate Audit

The ramifications of these events are unfolding.

In legal terms, there are a number of important distinctions from Climategate. First and most importantly, the key document is fake. Over and above that, there is strong reason to believe that Heartland can show that the actual (and much less damaging) documents were obtained by a form of identity theft. We’ll see whether “Heartland Insider” covered his tracks as well as FOIA. Thirdly, whereas FOIA had, for the most part, removed personal information, the actual Heartland documents include a great deal of personal information.

Heartland has sent out legal demands to a number of blogs, which, thus far, have either been ignored or rejected.

As a few commenters wisely observed, it’s time to get out the popcorn