Email 1817, May 2005, Phil Jones on what the IPCC actually did: They didn't tell us what was in the peer-reviewed literature, they gave us their own [warmist] opinions on which parts of the peer-reviewed literature were correct

Email 1817

In some parts of our chapter, we omit the poor [ie, non-warmist] papers. Just stressing that we are doing an assessment and not a review. An assessment is our expert view of the science at the present.